mid exhaust box replaced

Discussion in 'Mechanical - Engine, Gearbox, Exhaust etc' started by ianplymouth, Jun 4, 2020.

  1. ianplymouth

    ianplymouth RSM Club Member

    Mainly for @RS250 castle combe

    Changed the mid box today, the one i bought first was hitting the underside of the car, so it made a right racket when driving, mainly on the over run and cruising, was fine while powering up but really bad using the engine for braking.

    I slightly modified the first box as it wouldn't fit, it was touching the underside of the tunnel where the gear lever assembly fits through.

    The modification :blush:
    49971421261_b8c2c9d97e_k.jpg IMG_20200604_171530 by Ian Austin, on Flickr
     
    manugtt likes this.
  2. ianplymouth

    ianplymouth RSM Club Member

    The view from under the car, it was catching the crest when going in and out of my workshop.

    49971421886_6125cc7b0b_k.jpg IMG_20200604_162526 by Ian Austin, on Flickr

    So i ran the car up, placed my phone with a sound app, 0.5m from the exhaust and at about 45 degrees
    This was the reading, it might not be accurate but it was to give me some sort of reference, most was on tick over, but then blipped it up to 4500rpm

    49971680187_69a0142d32_k.jpg Screenshot_20200604-144534 by Ian Austin, on Flickr
     
  3. ianplymouth

    ianplymouth RSM Club Member

    The difference between the two box's, bigger one is 6" diameter the smaller one is 4" diameter, both are 22" in length total, the exhaust pipe is 3" in diameter.

    49971683837_b7e9114a3d_k.jpg IMG_20200604_164931 by Ian Austin, on Flickr

    Box fitted in and it now looks like there is a bit better ground clearance :laughing::laughing:

    49970903568_9f15777536_k.jpg IMG_20200604_171614 by Ian Austin, on Flickr
     
  4. ianplymouth

    ianplymouth RSM Club Member

    now to find out what the difference in sound is, think i will try and live with this and get to a track and see what they come up with as a level.

    49971418416_15d1f95c6d_k.jpg Screenshot_20200604-172832 by Ian Austin, on Flickr
     
  5. Your hammer must to be a good one, right Ian?:tonguewink:
    A bit more noise with the 4" one, but look better in my opinion.
     
  6. ianplymouth

    ianplymouth RSM Club Member

    I whacked the shite out of the big one with my little 4lb lump hammer and that was the best i could do, don't think it was ever going to fall apart.
     
    manugtt likes this.
  7. Some great detail here Ian !!! I'm impressed ...
    the 3" is the one to go for & it looks better in my opinion ..
    I cant remember was yours 90 db to start with ? if So you gained 12 which would bring mine down to around 86 ! All good for Thruxton :neutral:
     
  8. ianplymouth

    ianplymouth RSM Club Member

    It all depends who's measuring it, think i was 84db at Bedford with the 3" and a cat fitted, went to another and i'm sure it was around 87db, so will have to go to a track to find out for real.
     
  9. Ok so as a rough guide i could gain around 6db to 9db going by your figures..
     
  10. ianplymouth

    ianplymouth RSM Club Member

    I think i'm going to have to wait till i get to a track to really see what the level is
     
  11. That's good, I measured 87db static at Bedford with a completely stock exhaust (inc mid box).
     

  • Share This Page